Jump to content

Talk:Riesz–Fischer theorem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the interest of un-stubbing this article, I ask others to include in it any applications of the Riesz-Fischer theorem. I will do the same. NatusRoma 21:16, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

convergence requirement

[edit]

In Kolmogorov and Fomin, Introductory Real Analysis, ISBN 0486612260, page 153 says the following:


Given a Euclidean space R, let {φk} be an orthonormal (but not necessarily complete) system in R. It follows from Bessel's inequality that a necessary condition for the numbers c1,c2,…ck,… to be Fourier coefficients of an element f ∈ R is that the series

converge. It turns out that this condition is also sufficient if R is complete, as shown by

Theorem 9 (Riesz-Fischer). Given an orthonormal system {φk} in a complete Euclidean space R, let the numbers c1,c2,…ck,… be such that
converges. Then there exists an element f ∈ R with c1,c2,…ck,… as its Fourier coefficients, i.e., such that
where

This suggests that the edit changing "converges uniformly" to merely "converges" is correct. --KSmrqT 07:02, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. NatusRoma 08:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely "uniformly" is wrong. But please note that the anonymous editor did not change it to just plain "converges", but rather to "converges in L2". Michael Hardy 19:43, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Before, it said, "converges uniformly in the space L2". I suppose that I should have given more context to the change when quoting it. NatusRoma 21:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As of November 2008 (three years after the posts above), the article said converges normally, with a link to an article where this means that

which is certainly wrong for orthogonal series in a Hilbert space. I made a change in the spirit of summable families, but finding an appropriate link would be better. Bdmy (talk) 21:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]