Jump to content

Talk:Wake Me Up When September Ends

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Really?

[edit]

Do individual songs usually deserve wikipedia entries? 65.11.69.130 22:15, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Almost anything NOTABLE is included in wikipedia. Notability, however, doesn't include every garage band. Lotsofissues 22:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yes, they do, not songs that aren't singles though. That would be pointless and lengthy. --Zzguitar14 (talk) 15:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wake Me Up When September Ends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wake Me Up When September Ends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2017

[edit]

Could someone change the part where it says "The song became the fourth single from American Idiot to be certified platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America." to "The song became the fourth single from American Idiot to be certified 2x platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America." And change the Certification from Platinum which is 1 million to 2 million[1] 208.54.39.212 (talk) 14:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: For @Bowielowie too, read this for why. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 August 2017

[edit]

Could you change the BPI certification from Sliver to Gold, as it went Gold in September 2016 and the RIAA certification from platinum to 2x platinum in the certifications part[1][2] 76.125.38.35 (talk) 01:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wake Me Up When September Ends/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 04:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs) 23:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This caught my attention on Discord, and I couldn't resist. :) Expect comments in the next few days! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A quick comment before I dive any deeper: there seems to be some close paraphrasing with this source. See the report. Most of the red highlights are the song's title or quoted lyrics, but there is some text from the article that's too similar for my liking. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed one of the questionable bits (which, to clear up, I did not write), but other than that it just seems to have a high rating because of how many times the song title is said. This shouldn't be a problem now. λ NegativeMP1 05:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment: I was adding some info to the article when I noticed some repeated citations and crosslinks to news sources appearing in a seemingly arbitrary fashion. May be worth doing a quick, second pass to clean up the article's references a bit. Leafy46 (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there's an area I'm missing, this is only an issue with the references auto-generated by the charts template, which is an issue I noticed and have no idea how to fix since it's related to templates. I'll run a second check through the maim prose sources, though. λ NegativeMP1 16:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just from a quick look, refs #17 and #18 (Rolling Stone No. 958) are duplicated, for instance -- as for the chart templates, if you go to the specific single chart and click "show all", there should be a field called "refgroup" which allows you to use that chart reference in a <ref name=whatever> fashion. Leafy46 (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]