Talk:Geometrized unit system

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

Archives: Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Introduction[edit]

Hello Pervect

It seems that the sentence is incomplete:

In situations involving electrical units, we add the constraint that the quantity 4πε₀, where ε₀ is vacuum permittivity. 83.30.48.117 (talk) 18:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

as it is now, the two entries "elecitric potential" and "potential" (the very last) are identical. would it not make much more sense to interpret the second potential as gravitational potential? then its SI dimension would be [L² T^-2] (the same as energy/mass), and the multiplication factor would just be c^-2. --Diogenes2000 (talk) 02:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Potential[edit]

as it is now, the two entries "elecitric potential" and "potential" (the very last) are identical. would it not make much more sense to interpret the second potential as gravitational potential? then its SI dimension would be [L² T^-2] (the same as energy/mass), and the multiplication factor would just be c^-2. --Diogenes2000 (talk) 02:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion factors between meter, kilogram, second, coulomb and kelvin[edit]

Here you have all needed conversion factors that covers all SI base units, and if not possible, their unique elements:

into m

G/c^2 [m/kg]
c [m/s]
((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5)/c^2 [m/C]
(G*k)/c^4 [m/K]

into kg

c^2/G [kg/m]
c^3/G [kg/s]
1/(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5 [kg/C]
k/c^2 [kg/K]

into s

1/c [s/m]
G/c^3 [s/kg]
((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5)/c^3 [s/C]
(G*k)/c^5 [s/K]

into C

c^2/((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5) [C/m]
(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5 [C/kg]
c^3/((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5) [C/s]
(k*(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5)/c^2 [C/K]

into K

c^4/(G*k) [K/m]
c^2/k [K/kg]
c^5/(G*k) [K/s]
c^2/(k*(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5) [K/C]

All these units represents nothing else than distance along dimension, that makes SI redundant in comparison to geometrized units. I added all these abovementioned factors after proper formatting to article. They can be verified in Google calculator.

This all is exactly equivalent to dividing of one Planck unit by another Planck unit, while using their direct SI values. 83.30.150.203 (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geometric quantities[edit]

I removed an entire section with a table of conversions. @Anubub reverted the change, but I took it out again based on WP:BURDEN.

The table entries need a reference. If the entries are trivial, then we don't need the table. If the entries are WP:NOTABLE then they need a reference.

In addition, the practical issue is that entries in the table keep being changed and we have no justification for reverting such changes because we have no reference. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]