Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Omnipotence paradox

Omnipotence paradox

I worked on this article several months ago. Checking in to see how it had developed since then, I can only say that it has devolved into a mishmash of "original research", to use the phrase loosely. I'm sure there's wheat within the chaff, but I don't have the time (or the courage) to seek it all myself.

Anville 14:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Referred to User:Ben Babcock · Katefan0^(scribble) 16:37, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Here's an interesting observation: I was Googling for articles to reference on the subject, and came up with this tidbit. I read it over and said to myself, "Hmm, this seems familiar." Sure enough, at he bottom of the page . . . "The source of this article is Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL." Ben Babcock 12:48, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added to User:NicholasTurnbull/Desk because this hasn't been updated in over a month. -- Beland 2 July 2005 03:54 (UTC)

Ahem, yes. There isn't much to do . . . I indicated on the talk page that I think it is ready to be closed but would appreciate a second opinion. Ben Babcock 2 July 2005 07:21 (UTC)

Hmmm... interesting article subject. Difficult one to tackle in a suitably NPOV way, as the subject itself tends to tread on religious toes rather easily. Will review this article shortly and edit as appropriate. I notice that an NPOV warning banner is still on the page, so there might be more that needs doing than meets the eye.--NicholasTurnbull 2 July 2005 18:20 (UTC)

Have done some cleanup work on the article and made a few minor improvements. There wasn't much more to be done; the article was already of a high standard. I am satisfied with the quality of this article now, and I can't find any NPOV issues that I haven't corrected. I am hereby closing this task.--NicholasTurnbull 3 July 2005 22:19 (UTC)