Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    List of all-time NBA win–loss records

    Reason: Persistent IP disruptive edits. Please see the list's talk page, as well as message I left on relevant WikiProject talk page.

    Multiple IPs being used (at least 4: 1; 2; 3; 4), and largely ignoring my edit summaries, as well as talk page messages, and user talk page messages.

    @Ad Orientem: You said "Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection." but please look at the list's edit history, and you'll see there is actually a lot of such activity. IPs have reverted edits from another user (see here). Soulbust (talk) 20:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Soulbust I'm seeing a very large body of IP edits and only a handful have been reverted. That said, I'm also seeing corrective editing. Most of the anonymous edits have been by a couple of IPs. We don't usually protect pages when the problem is just one or two editors. Once adequately warned, if the disruption persists then we issue blocks. The problem with page protection, and the reason we treat it as a last resort, is that it prevents constructive editing by anonymous users. Sometimes that's unavoidable but we try to keep it to a minimum. Is this actual vandalism, or just well-intentioned edits that are not helpful? If it's actual vandalism and warnings have been issued, either ping me with diffs or report it to AIV. Otherwise, as frustrating as it may be, try to communicate with the IPs to let them know they are not helping and why. If all else fails, we can page block them. Let me know if you have any questions or I'm missing something. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Quick clarification to the above. Those are probably just two editors as they are each operating within a /64 range. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay thank you for the reply. I think it is a bit tricky for sure, as there is some positive to glean from the edits that've been made. But they're just amid a bunch of very (perhaps disruptive is too strong a word here) unconstructive(?) or unhelpful edits. I've tried to communicate through the edit summaries and whatnot, and that has recently seemed to at least garner some sort of actual edit summaries being made by the IP editors. I'll try to navigate the issue, as I am assuming good faith here, and do believe that because a portion of the edits are actually constructive, that all of them are being made with well-meaning intent. Idk, it is incredibly frustrating like you suggested, but I'll try to work with it. Soulbust (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Alexandre Sarr

    Temporary protection: Vandalism by multiple IPs Adakiko (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Jalauka

    Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by caste warriors. Nxcrypto Message 02:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Bay of Pigs

    Reason: Repeated undiscussed move events A Tree In A Box (talk) 03:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Perhaps blocking the particular user that is doing the moving is best. I just don’t think they understand that they need to do an RFC. A Tree In A Box (talk) 04:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pittwater High School

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 04:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Lowell High School (San Francisco)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same disruption as before. Protection until July 1, as requested before, would be nice. Dhtwiki (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sharvari

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term age-related disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ariana DeBose

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Florida Panthers

    Reason: Why would you lock my favorite team page on Wikipedia? If you do not make this happen by June 26, 2025. I am making a better version with no locked pages. Thank you for understanding. 189.174.145.87 (talk) 22:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Recommend turning down the request, as IP's promise of making a 'new' Florida Panthers page, comes across as either an WP:OWN, WP:NOTHERE or WP:CIR issue. GoodDay (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Ultimatums from anonymous fanboys won't go anywhere, either. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.