Jump to content

Talk:Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeJapanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598) was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 23, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 16, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 20, 2013, July 20, 2015, and July 20, 2016.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Joseon Army[edit]

Last year I created a Joseon Army page, so if anyone can help me edit this page you might find some information there for you to put into the Imjin War page. Koreanidentity10000 2:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, great job. — Sadko (words are wind) 13:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overreliance on one source[edit]

Vast sections of the article are paraphrasing a single book. I appreciate that it is clearly written and mostly informative, however, for such a large scale military campaign it would be nice to have a more balanced perspective. Currently, this seems like an introduction to Mr Turnbull's class on the topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_with_a_single_source Dawet (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree surely there are other sources out there at least about basic information TheWikiJedi (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Among the 360 footnotes, there are 142 calls for Turnbull. It isn't clear if (Turnbull, Stephen, p. 040, 2008) and (Turnbull, Stephen, p. 040, 2002) are the same reference or not. Moreover, it isn't clear why page 39 was never referenced. Pldx1 (talk)

Disambig in title[edit]

Question—why is the date disambiguation needed in the title? Are there other Japanese invasions of Korea? Is it because of Korea's annexation in the 20th century? If so, I think the annexation isn't really considered a military invasion. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 06:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just realized; is it just trying to make clear that the article covers both invasions? 14.49.153.193 (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]