Jump to content

Talk:Bob Dylan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleBob Dylan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 17, 2004.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 8, 2003Featured article candidatePromoted
August 12, 2005Featured article reviewKept
September 7, 2006Featured article reviewKept
October 28, 2008Featured article reviewKept
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 13, 2016.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 19, 2013, March 19, 2016, March 19, 2017, March 19, 2020, March 19, 2022, and March 19, 2023.
Current status: Featured article


wonderfull SPON.de article (in German)

[edit]

Nice article about a very, very loyal long-term fan in (former Eastern) Germany: https://www.spiegel.de/geschichte/bob-dylan-in-oel-wie-das-gemaelde-aufs-konzert-in-ost-berlin-kam-a-52cdc5fa-eef8-4e9f-bced-379d61a1075a

Latest set of changes (by User:Nikkimaria)

[edit]

That's a lot of small revisions. Looking at it quickly, I see some I don't like, some I do, and some in the middle. What do people think? Just for instance, I don't think taking out the description of the Nobel Prize is warranted - the Nobel Prize was a big deal.Brianyoumans (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's elaborated in the text - the lead is still quite long. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see that now. Makes sense. Brianyoumans (talk) 17:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it was a v useful copy edit, pruning & tightening. A few phrases have gone which I regret but I welcome constructive attempt to keep this long WP article in good shape. Mick gold (talk) 22:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2024

[edit]

On June 21, 2024, Dylan initiated the Outlaw Music Festival Tour, sharing the bill with Willie Nelson and other musicians.[406] ADD: Dylan's setlist during this tour is a departure from the Rough and Rowdy Ways Tour, including songs from throughout his career as well as several covers. [1] Notrobbieclark (talk) 20:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for suggestion. This has been added. Mick gold (talk) 06:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Going electric

[edit]

This page says Dylan only played three songs at Newport in 1965, but the main page about the controversy says he played five there the following night. Seananony (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At Newport 1965, Dylan and his band, including Bloomfield and Kooper, played a short electric set of three songs (Maggie's Farm, LARS, Takes A Lot To Laugh) and then left the stage to a mix of cheering and booing. After a pause, Dylan was persuaded to return to the stage where he played 2 songs solo on acoustic guitar: Mr Tambourine Man and It's All Over Now Baby Blue. see [1] Mick gold (talk) 21:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retire! Such a waste of time at Pine knob. No singing 2600:1007:B0AB:DD68:1CEB:36E8:8D2B:5D0B (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2024

[edit]

Under "Honors" for Bob Dylan, please list that Bob Dylan is a 32° Scottish Rite Freemason, in the Valley of Los Angeles. His home Lodge is Santa Monica-Palisades Lodge, No. 307. MaynardEdwards (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. PianoDan (talk) 17:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dishonesty -- Dylan can't live outside the law

[edit]

In the book, The Double Life of Bob Dylan: A Restless Hungry Feeling, 1941-1966, author Clinton Heylin notes that the first time Dylan’s name appeared in print relative to his music career was in the August 6, 1961 New York Mirror where Pete Karman reported as follows, “Bob Dylan of Gallup, New Mexico played the guitar and harmonica…”

In those early days, somewhat George Santos-style, Dylan, apparently seeking to burnish his folksinger resume, claimed to have ridden the rails hobo style, worked in a carnival, and so forth.

But he was outed in the November 4, 1963, issue of Newsweek which set the record straight regarding his Hibbing, MN middle-class origins.

One would have thought that would have taught him a lesson, but no.

For instance, concerning his Chronicles: Volume One book of 2004, Dylan biographer Clinton Heylin has shown skepticism concerning the factualness of the book: "Jesus Christ, as far as I can tell almost everything in the Oh Mercy section of Chronicles is a work of fiction. I enjoy Chronicles as a work of literature, but it has a[s] much basis in reality as Masked And Anonymous…”

When he released his song, “Murder Most Foul,” he issued this statement:

“Greetings to my fans and followers with gratitude for all your support and loyalty across the years. This is an unreleased song we recorded a while back that you might find interesting. Stay safe, stay observant and may God be with you. Bob Dylan, March 27, 2020”

But Fiona Apple, who played piano on the song, later confirmed that the song had in fact been recorded only one month previously, in February 2020.

In his January 6, 2023 weekly column on CounterPunch, Jeffrey St. Clair notes, "From his recent interview with the Wall Street Journal, it sounds like Dylan’s gone back to Jesus: 'I’m a religious person. I read the scriptures a lot, meditate and pray, light candles in church. I believe in damnation and salvation, as well as predestination. The Five Books of Moses, Pauline Epistles, Invocation of the Saints, all of it.'”

Maybe that’s true, but given that in so many interviews Bob adopts a putting-one-on tone, why should one believe that?

Especially when compared with this previous statement of his from the article:

In 1997, he told David Gates of Newsweek:

   "Here's the thing with me and the religious thing. This is the flat-out truth: I find the religiosity and philosophy in the music. I don't find it anywhere else. Songs like "Let Me Rest on a Peaceful Mountain" or "I Saw the Light"—that's my religion. I don't adhere to rabbis, preachers, evangelists, all of that. I've learned more from the songs than I've learned from any of this kind of entity. The songs are my lexicon. I believe the songs." M.mk (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What changes are you recommending for the article? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I think of how this awkward info on the guy can be unawkwardly "woven in," I'll do that and half expect some Dylan worshipper to take it down.
Anyone else is welcome to do this.
I wanted the record to show, at least on the talk tab, this bad habit of Dylan's. M.mk (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that anything Dylan has said is "illegal", he hasn't said these statements in a court, but I've seen it said many times that what he says about his life is often opaque or outright incorrect. Is there still something in the article about this? It seems to me there might have been at one time. If there isn't, it should probably be mentioned as adding difficulties for accurate biographies of him.Brianyoumans (talk) 20:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added material noting that Chronicles borrows from many sources including Time magazine and the novels of Jack London. Also Heylin's comment in his 2023 biography that Chronicles is factually inaccurate. Mick gold (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that.
"Thinking out loud":
Perhaps a separate page listing out examples of Dylan in this regard.
For instance, there is a separate page entitled, "Bob Dylan and the Band 1974 Tour."
With a separate page, this ongoing character flaw of his comes into "focus" compared to examples appearing hither and thither in his page.
I wonder if anyone who knew him, associates or other artists, ever commented on this.
Keith Richards, for instance, can be pretty blunt in his criticisms of other artists.
What I compiled above, however, might be seen as a mere stub page unless there are further examples.
Plus, what title would such a page have?
"Bob Dylan, Big Fat Liar," probably won't do. M.mk (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a good idea, imho. Mick gold (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Really, no, we don't need that. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, here's the link to the 1963 Newsweek outing for someone to add to that part of his life with the superscript for footnote, etc.:
https://www.newsweek.com/bob-dylans-75th-birthday-revisit-our-infamous-1963-profile-462801 M.mk (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For me, the most significant outcome of Andrea Svedberg's 1963 Newsweek hack attack was that it inspired Dylan to write "Restless Farewell" on the The Times They Are a-Changin' album. (see p. 215 of Shelton's 1986 biography No Direction Home.) Here we are, 61 years later, Dylan is the most famous song writer of his generation and a Nobel Prize winner. "Oh a false clock tries to tick out my time/ To disgrace, distract, and bother me/ And the dirt of gossip blows into my face/ And the dust of rumors covers me/…So I’ll make my stand/ And remain as I am/ and bid farewell and not give a damn"
I'll try to add that info, and the Svedberg/Newsweek cite, to the "Restless Farewell" article when I have a moment. Mick gold (talk) 10:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, but the Newsweek article was dated, November 4, 1963 and Wikipedia has "Restless Farewell" recorded on October 31, 1963, tho, since, mags like Newsweek come out before their cover date, maybe he immediately wrote a song upon seeing their expose.
But regardless: "and not give a damn" -- at first he did. Maybe it was the Heylin Double Life book where I read it, but the Newsweek story had him lying low for a spell as a result of their story on him. M.mk (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe he immediately wrote and was able to record a song upon seeing the Newsweek expose, book studio time, round up producer Tom Wilson, and so forth. M.mk (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dylan was always a self-mythologizer; this is hardly a surprise. He creates and recreates himself, kinda the same way his idol Woody Guthrie did. M.mk seems to think this is a shameful thing, something to be written up as a criticism or a controversy. I disagree; it's worth a comment or two, at best. "Liar"? That's pretty nasty (and blows right through BLP). "To live outside the law you must be honest" -- yeah, and I don't see anywhere Dylan "lived outside the law". --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and by the way, magazines were and are indeed published a week to a month before the cover date. Here is the current The New Yorker cover, for example, dated a week from yesterday. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By titling this thread the way I did, I was alluding to a line from "Absolutely Sweet Marie."
It's a really good thing one cannot find hagiographic pieces on Wikipedia.
I am thankful for that. M.mk (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Heylin's Double Life, after the brief Gallup, NM quote by Karman in the New York Mirror, Heylin's first, rather dramatic, remark is, "It starts with a lie." (emphasis added) This as opposed to Heylin calling it self-mythologizing, Dylan recreating himself, or such. M.mk (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After the Preface, that is how Heylin opens his book. M.mk (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should make it clear that in Chronicles and elsewhere, Dylan has frequently mythologized himself. OTOH... Dylan doesn't owe anyone the details of his life. Many people in show business are very close-mouthed about their past and private life. Some have created personas with back stories out of whole cloth, for various reasons. Some people talk a lot about their past, but people's memories of their past are frequently incorrect in various ways. Basically, I agree that it's a good point that he has told many tall tales about his past, that should be in the article (and Mick has been working on that), but I feel like you want us to make value judgements about Dylan, that he is a "liar", a bad person, for telling untruths. I'm not sure that's within our purview at Wikipedia. As long as the untruths are not told maliciously, I think to some extent it is just part of how many celebrities cope with or manage their fame and public image.Brianyoumans (talk) 17:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Point taken.
Dylan early established himself with songs like "Blowin' in the Wind," "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" and so forth (songs he later called finger-pointing songs, then saying he wasn't going to do those any more) as something like a truth-teller and this has "followed him around" to this very day whereby, for instance, even people like Robert Fripp would ask on a King Crimson forum several of years ago, "Would Dylan lie for money?" when making some point about integrity.
Well, in the case of Chronicles, for instance, yes, it seems so, Mr. Fripp. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Hopefully the outed other celebrities don't keep doing it.
"The truth is the most articulate thing you can say." --John Lydon M.mk (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So write something, well sourced, backing your position, and see if you can get consensus for keeping it in the article. Your accusatory tone here doesn't indicate you'll do well at establishing the proper WP:NPOV; surprise us. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I will, but I had two very brief things taken down within minutes re Mal Evans, the Beatles' assistant, based on the new book about him, so who wants to expend the effort when emotions run so high about "idols" and one's work then gets removed?
(See talk tabs for "Here, There and Everywhere" and "Sgt. Pepper" (song) where I describe my attempts.)
Incidentally, the "typical" celebrity doesn't have a truth-teller "millstone" around their neck like Mr. Dylan created for himself with his early songs though I still would prefer people not make up things about their past no matter who they are. I guess that's just me. M.mk (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given that this is BOB DYLAN, I'm a little surprised that more people than three aren't weighing in -- or piling on me, heh.
But thanks for taking the time. M.mk (talk) 19:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We've known for a long time not to use his Chronicles or anything else he's said or written as a WP:RS. That's all that really matters regarding his veracity. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"We've known for a long time not to use his Chronicles..."
Congratulations, since the average bloke plunking down $27 for the hardcover probably has no inkling of that cos there's nothing in the jacket copy nor a prefatory comment from Mr. Dylan on the liberties he takes.
The average bloke thinks he's gonna get something straight from the horse's mouth, but it's more like from the horse's ass.
As a result, Heylin says about it:
"He's not the first guy to write a biography that's a pack of lies..."
Note the L-word. M.mk (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]