Talk:Serbs of Croatia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serbs of Croatia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 21 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Serbs of Croatia was copied or moved into List of Serbs of Croatia. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article was nominated for merging with List of Serbs of Croatia on July 2018. The result of the discussion (redundant list permanent link) was Merge section Serbs of Croatia#Notable people to destination article. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Serbs inhabit most of Dalmatia[edit]
@Mikola22: Do you have the full quote? How do you know that it's "just a translation"? PLease explain before removing the material and do not link other discussions. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Here is the source [1], se page 111. Mikola22 (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Sadko: The book by Scholz is a translation into modern English of the Royal Frankish Annals from 741 to 829, so it is clearly primary. Also, I am not sure why it should be wrong to link to other discussions. Then it might not be necessary to explain the same thing again and again. --T*U (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Primary source and information[edit]
In 1222, the King of Serbia Stefan Prvovenčani gifted Mljet, Babino Polje, the Saint Vid church on Korčula, Janin and Popova Luka and churches of St. Stephen and St. George, to a Benedictine monastery on Mljet.
- This information is from "Codex diplomaticus Regni Croatiae, Dalmatiae et Slavoniae" ie summarium of historical diplomatic documents from year 1905. Source, page 480, [2] and it is WP:PRIMARY. Mikola22 (talk) 10:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Why is it primary? It's a historical fact. History must be based on original documents, ain't it so? Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- History indeed must must be based on original documents, but we must also follow some Wikipedia rules. It is primary because it is a collection of all historical diplomatic documents in some time period. If we start to using such information's and such sources then only the sky is our limit. Mikola22 (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) C'mon, Sadko, of course it is primary. Did you take a look? The given source is Volume 3 (out of 18) of a collection of mediaeval source material, written in Latin and Church Slavonic. The relevant text is number 197, which you find in pp. 237–239 of the online version Mikola22 linked to (paginated 223–225). It is in Church Slavonic, written with a script I assume is contemporary with the text. --T*U (talk) 15:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)