Category talk:Intelligent design
![]() | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I am relieved to see that you dispel the common pseudo-scientific belief that Andy Devine created all things. Please keep the section entitled, "Non Devine Creation." Thank you.
- Always thought it was Sydney Devine, meself. ...dave souza 07:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Parent categories
[edit]See Category talk:Creationism and Talk:Intelligent design#I've been bold and (hopefully) defused the situation:, and leave this page as a subcategory of pseudoscience. Please. ....dave souza 20:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
There are a bunch of articles in this cat (intelligent design) and also in the parent cat (pseudoscience). Can we get the articles moved out of the parent cat of pseudoscience? They're mostly just cluttering that cat; there doesn't seem to be much point in having them here and there. I tried doing this on my own, but was pomptly reverted ... linas 02:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Intelligent Design is Pseudoscience?
[edit]Based on arbitration and clarification on same, the Pseudoscience category, which has been applied to this category, requires a reliable source indicating that it is in fact pseudoscience to sustain its application. Can you point out some reliable source that will settle the matter? If not, we'll need to remove the Pseudoscience category tag from this category. Thank you.-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Did you even look at the article on ID? Check out the second paragraph down. The category stays. — Scientizzle 00:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, this seems fairly obvious, thanks.-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Explanation of "Denialism" category's removal
[edit]The use of the label, which actively implies unequivocal condemnation of whatever it is applied to as meritless and false, obviously does not belong here, or on any category of similar broadness, for that matter. JustMyTwoCents (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- That is only obvious to people who don't know a lot about ID. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Category:Intelligent design page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Category:Intelligent design" page.
- Category-Class Creationism articles
- NA-importance Creationism articles
- Category-Class Intelligent design articles
- NA-importance Intelligent design articles
- Intelligent design articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles
- Category-Class Alternative Views articles
- NA-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Category-Class Christianity articles
- NA-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Category-Class Conservatism articles
- NA-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Category-Class Skepticism articles
- NA-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Category-Class Religion articles
- NA-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles